
Published In The June Issue Of Target
Marketing Magazine
Written By NETexponent CEO, Peter Figueredo
By: Peter Figueredo, CEO NETexponent
Deciding whether to outsource online direct response efforts or to build an in-house marketing team is a decision every advertiser faces at different stages in their development. Some advertisers need to outsource immediately, others establish a marketing practice internally before outsourcing, and still others find that building an internal marketing team is best for the long term. Determining the best course of action requires an evaluation process based on:
(1)goals
(2)timing
(3)staffing.
Today
advertisers can select from a variety of specialist
agencies offering outsourced solutions for services
such as affiliate marketing, media partnerships, search
marketing, direct response creative, CRM, and email.
In order to start the evaluation process, every advertiser
must take into consideration their unique Goals, Timing,
and Staffing when trying to answer the outsourcing
question.
Goals
Goals mean a variety of things to different advertisers
For those marketers dependent upon an aggressive online
strategy, with clearly defined goals. it often makes
sense to outsource the program. Similarly, outsourcing
is less important when goals are not aggressive and
even difficult when goal metrics are not clearly defined
or frequently changing.
Specialists offer the greatest capacity
to deliver on aggressive online goals because they
begin the program with extensive knowledge of what
works and what doesn't. Knowledge of the most current
best practices is a compliment to the negotiation
leverage and network of established relationships.
Additionally, outsourcing to a specialist allows the
marketer to shift internal resource decisions and
staffing needs to their partner for a fixed period.
Ultimately, if the program's goals are not being met
within an appropriate evaluation time, the advertiser
has the added benefit of severing the outsourcing
relationship in a less costly and interruptive way
than if an in-house team was used.
Timing
Time to market is normally a challenge for every advertiser
building an in-house marketing team. Advertisers with
aggressive time to market goals benefit significantly
from outsourcing partners that get efforts up and
running quickly on an established learning curve .
For marketers choosing not to outsource, the most
common roadblocks to speedy setup include; hiring
time, planning, learning curve, technology integration,
etc.
It often takes several extra months to launch an online direct response program in-house. This could be shorter if qualified staff is available internally, but even in such cases, even the smoothest resource transitions rarely match the speed of an experienced outsourcer. If a quick start time is not a priority then an in-house solution may still be a viable option, provided that other externalities don't hinder program uptake.
Staffing
The beauty of online marketing is the degree to which
technology has increased the efficiencies at the baseline
of all interactive programs. Even so, technology cannot
replace the honed thinking of experienced staff. Most
online Direct Response efforts show a direct correlation
between staff time and results. Staffing resources
must be deliberately allocated with the aim of achieving
aggressive volume, quality, or efficiency goals.
When dealing with new marketing practices, essentially all online marketing must confront issues of quality staffing. Hiring qualified staff is increasingly difficult and costly just try to hire an experienced search marketer or affiliate manager for less than a six figure salary! Complex efforts require a diverse team dedicated to achieving aggressive goals. Unless resources are available, it may not be cost effective to hire multiple people for an in-house effort, and a single mid/high level hire will not maximize their value when performing necessary low level tasks. Outsourcing provides advertisers the ability to quickly acquire an experienced team of professionals with diverse skill sets.
After the in-house vs. outsource question has been answered it is beneficial to revisit the decision periodically in order to determine if it is still the best option.
PETER FIGUEREDO is co-founder and CEO of NYC-based NETexponent (www.NETexponent.com), an online direct marketing agency for companies looking to maximize their online customer acquisitions.